Juana Tejada Law and other changes to LCP: Victory to
all caregivers
“Orthodox
historians have presented history as a succession of exploits of eminent personalities, leading many of us to regard history
as the product of gifted individuals. …. We must discard the belief that we are incapable of producing the heroes of
our epoch, that heroes are exceptional beings, accidents of history who stand above the masses and apart from them. The true
hero is one with the masses: … does not exist above them. In fact, a whole people can be heroes given the proper motivation
and articulation of their dreams.” (Renato Constantino, Veneration without Understanding)
The people and the people alone make
their own history. In the end, it is they who are the real heroes. And so the caregivers with different sectors of the community,
through their own campaigns, in different forms and across the country scored victories.
In this context,
Migrante-Ontario welcomes the proposed new regulations to the Live-in Caregiver Program announced last Saturday, December
12 by Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenny.
The proposed
changes include the Juana Tejada Law which eliminates the required second medical examination for caregivers when applying
to become permanent residents in Canada.
This is indeed a
great honour for the late Juana Tejada who, together with Migrante-Ontario and its allied organizations, and the Independent
Workers’ Association, advocated for the elimination of the second medical requirement so that other caregivers would
not suffer the same sad experience she had went through.
It was Juana Tejada
who exposed this ambiguity in the immigration system. She risked her status and fought the threat of deportation
so that other caregivers like her could have better protection of their rights. It was she who, with the
help of her lawyer Raffy Fabregas and numerous advocates and activists and the community in general, pushed the immigration
officials to act in the right direction. If there is someone to be called “champion and hero”
for the gains caregivers just won, it was Juana Tejada. She is, in this sense, a true “champion and
hero” of the Filipino people in Canada.
Other significant
changes include: eligibility of caregivers to apply for residency after completing 3,900 hours of employment
done in a minimum of 22 months; allowing caregivers to use part [10% only] of their overtime
work to be counted in the new hours-based calculation; allowing caregivers to complete the work requirement from three to
four years; requiring employers to pay for “travel cost for live-in caregivers to come to Canada, medical insurance
until live-in caregivers become eligible for provincial health coverage,
and workplace safety insurance and any recruiting fees owed to third parties;”
setting up of a dedicated telephone hotline for caregivers; emergency processing of work permits; and, blacklisting of erring
employers for two years.
Minister Kenney’s
announcement came a few days after the Ontario Parliament passed Bill-210 into law. The new Employment Protection
for Foreign Nationals Act bans employment agencies or recruiters
from charging live-in caregivers placement or recruitment fees. It also prohibits the practice of taking
a caregiver's personal documents such as a passport or work permit.
These initiatives
– both federal and provincial - bring significant changes to the LCP. We say this is a victory for
all caregivers and the community.
Still let
us not forget that implementation of these new measures requires our vigilant monitoring. And while there
is reason for us to rejoice, celebrating this as a victory in the right direction, we continue to exert efforts working towards
other fundamental changes to the LCP like making the live-in requirement optional, issuing job-specific instead of employer-specific
work-permits, looking into acceptable wage rates, ensuring the safety and well-being of caregivers for the duration of their
stay in the employers’ home, among other things. We then reserve our right to comment on the proposed
regulations during its 30-day comment period. «